requestId:684c3e4f8b1cd0.17207912.
Xiong Shili’s “Quantity” plan and its continuous refining ideas
Author: Zhang Qingxiong
Source: “Revival Report” (Social Science Edition) 2021 Issue 3
Abstract: Xiong Shili strives to build quantitative theory with Chinese characteristics (knowledge theory). It includes three aspects: 1. Experience and analysis methods of “identifying things and realizing them”; 2. Taiwan Insurance Network certification methods of “realizing the divine knowledge”; 3. The way of confidant and internal certification. In order to achieve this goal, he insisted on using Confucianism as a means of rest, and absorbed the quantitative and intellectual theory of India, as well as the knowledge and logic of the East. This is a creative task that integrates ancient and modern times, and needs to be integrated through its own deep assessment and reflection on the universe and life. Xiong Shili was unable to complete his quantitative plan during his lifetime. In order to further refine his knowledge, we need to be clear about his existing results and questionable ideas, and we need to receive new results from modern cognitive and methodological discussions. This is a huge task with a long journey. The task of continuation of the magnification can be divided into three steps: 1. Find out the views of Xiong Shili himself from his own works, and combine his quantitative analysis in the “Original Confucianism” to make it rich in content. 2. Sorting out the intellectual theory in Chinese philosophy, especially the basic establishment of Chinese Confucianism’s “seeking truth from facts” and the proof thinking in “Big Yi”; at the same time, pay attention to sorting out the quantitative theory in Indian philosophy, contact the teachings to pass on the development of quantitative theory and its impact on Chinese Confucianism, and clarify the origin and flow of the ideological concept of Xiong Shiwei. 3. Contact the cognitive and methodological discussions in Oriental Philosophy, draw on the results of its new development, and continue to supplement Xiong Shili’s quantitative discussions through integration and criticism reforms.
Keywords: Xiong Shili; Quantitative; Continuous; Neo-Confucianism;
Author introduction: Zhang Qingxiong, professor at the School of Philosophy of the Dalian School of Science and Technology, doctoral supervisor
Xiong Shili uses “quantitative” and “context” as a framework to construct the philosophical system of modern neo-Confucianism. Xiong Shili wrote “New Identity Discussion”, the original plan included two parts: “Context Discussion” and “Quantity Discussion”. Next to the title of “New Ideology” (verbal text) that has been published, is “context” labeled. The confession of “context” has been completed, and “context” is to be made. Xiong Shili pointed out in “Original Confucianism”: “The two chapters of measurement (1. Comparative and Comparative; 2. Verification and Comparative) are abbreviated as above. Now the spirit has declined, and although I want to write a key point, I cannot achieve it. Later, there is an author who can make his wish, but he does not need to achieve his own achievements. What regret is that Xiong Shili himself believes that the measurement has not been completed yet, and hopes that future generations will restore it.
1. Xiong TenThe planning of quantitative theory of force and its characteristics
“Quantity” is a large part of the “knowledge theory” in Eastern philosophy. Xiong Shili pointed out: “The Measurement means knowledge, and see “The Commentary on the Night of the Next Year”. The quantitative analysis is about knowledge.” [1] The current problem is that since “metrics” can also be called “knowledge theory”, and modern Eastern philosophy is effective in developing quantitative intelligence (intellectuality), it has been quite developed in knowledge discussion. Why does Xiong Shili still need to construct quantitative theory? This question is not only raised by Chinese scholars studying Western studies from time to time, but also people in the modern Neo-Confucian school often ask. One of the most typical points here is that the Eastern intellectual theory can be used directly like the Eastern technology, and the intrinsic insights in Chinese philosophy can be grafted into the Eastern intellectual theory. This will result twice as much with half the effort and will be useless. Xiong Shili has a different understanding of this. He explained his quantitative planning in the words of “Original Confucianism” and answered this most important question.
If we combine Xiong Shili’s “New Ideology” and other later works, such as Xiong Shili’s “New Ideology” and you will find that the “quantity” mentioned by Xiong Shili is more broad than the meaning of the quantitative or intellectual theory we think, and we will always be in harmony with his “context” or original theory. Specifically, Xiong Shili’s “measurement” is closely linked to Xiong Shili’s “physical use is not paid”, “mind and things are not paid”, and “heaven and man are not paid”, and as long as he understands the quantitative he advocates, the intrinsic theory he developed in “New Identity” and “physical use is perfect”. More importantly, Xiong Shili worked hard to construct his quantitative theory closely related to his Confucianism. He did not just want to borrow intellectual theory from India and the East, but wanted to develop intellectual theory from classics of Chinese foreign civilization such as “Yi Dao” and build a Confucian-centered intellectual theory system with Chinese characteristics. He believed that the Confucian-oriented intellectual theory in China had its superb level, which was the mutual understanding of knowledge theory and the great problems of the universe and life. Some people criticized this seriously in “The Original Confucianism” Sweetheart Baobaobaobaobao NetworkThe practice of separating knowledge from the intrinsic theory: “When discussing knowledge is not related to the intrinsic theory, it is a fragmented and purified. This is a philosophical micro phenomenon, which can be discarded. Philosophical study of the Philosophical Book In the original study, if a person who talks about knowledge and disregards the problem of the universe and life, he will try to discuss the research on intellectual theory, but I don’t know how to answer it.” [2]
When we talk about quantitative or intellectual theory, what we think of is evidence and evidence of experience observation, conceptual analysis, logic and theory. In Xiong Shili’s opinion, it is just a “comparative measurement” study in the quantitative analysis. Xiong Shili clearly pointed out in “Original Confucianism” that the quantitative analysis includes two parts: “Comparative Essay” and “Certification Essay”. 【2】Xiong Shili in “Original Religion”The “quantitative” planned in 》 not only refers to the knowledge, method and logic of research on the internal world, but also includes ways and methods of how to achieve the original body. Quantitative discussion not only discusses the “quantitative wisdom” in the phenomenon world, but also studies the “sexual wisdom” in the body world. In Xiong Shili’s view, “nature wisdom” is a kind of “spirit of connecting all images of the universe” that humans have; “verification” refers to the state or realm of understanding the original body when the inner verification of the natural wisdom. At this time, “there is a big hole, and the outside world cannot be raised, it is completely unresponsive, and it is silent.” [2] Only when we reach this level of certification can we understand the “big body” of all things in the universe through our own “small body”. From this we can see that the quantitative theory mentioned by Xiong Shili is more broad than the simplified scope of experience, rationalism and knowledge theory in modern Eastern philosophy, and Kant’s pre-exploratory philosophy. It contains the “certification” theory that is particularly valued in Eastern philosophy.
Regarding the department of “comparison”, Xiong Shili believed that “comparison” not only “distinguishing things and realizing their problems”, but also includes “deepening the divine knowledge” understanding and method discussion. In Xiong Shili’s view, this “definition method” is “declaration method”. This is to say that in addition to the practical and analytical knowledge theory of dcard, the quantitative theory also includes the “certification method”. Xiong Shili wrote: “Students must understand the methods of verification before they can silence the spirit.” [2]
“Distinguishing things and correcting the relationship” refers to distinguishing things, clarifying language, and correctly applying concepts. “Testing to imply its consequences” means that theory should be based on sensory experience observation and actual measurement; if there is no realization and deduction, the theory of the tree standing cannot be avoide
發佈留言